Chandimal appeals against ICC sanction for ball tampering charges

Chandimal appeals against ICC sanction for ball tampering charges


Dinesh Chandimal, along with Hathurusingha and Gurusinha, was charged with a level 3 offence.

Dinesh Chandimal, together with Hathurusingha and Gurusinha, was charged with a stage three offence. © Getty

Sri Lanka skipper Dinesh Chandimal, on Thursday (June 21), appealed against the charges laid against him on grounds of ball-tampering after the match referee Javagal Srinath arrived on the conclusion having studied the video proof from the third day’s motion of the second Check against the Windies, the ICC confirmed.

An fascinating authorized battle is now on the playing cards between the legal professionals of Sri Lanka Cricket and Worldwide Cricket Council after the previous has determined to contest the ICC sanctions. Following Srinath’s resolution of handing the Sri Lankan skipper a one-match ban together with a fantastic of 100 per cent of his match charges, the ICC introduced that CEO David Richardson had charged Chandimal, head coach Chandika Hathurusingha and workforce supervisor Asanka Gurusinha of a extra critical Degree three offence which pertains to conduct that’s opposite to the spirit of the sport.

The Sri Lankans have been charged for holding up play for two hours on the morning of day three after the umpires accused the Sri Lankan captain of ball tampering.

SLC officers have been in dialogue with the Sri Lankan aspect that’s presently in Barbados and late Wednesday evening decided to contest the cost. SLC sources had talked about on Wednesday that the board will inform the choice to the ICC the next morning.

Meaning the ICC must appoint a Judicial Commissioner to listen to the case and the trio of Chandimal, Hathurusingha and Gurusinha is not going to be suspended from the third and last day-night Check in Barbados.

A stage three offence carries a penalty of a ban of two to 4 Check matches and if discovered responsible, the highest brass of the Sri Lankan aspect will miss most a part of the house sequence against South Africa subsequent month.

Sri Lanka are believed to be contesting the cost on the grounds of inconsistency of utility of the rule and never following correct process. The cost against Chandimal was laid on the morning of day three and Sri Lankan imagine that he ought to have been charged on day two. Nevertheless, officers have 18 hours to cost a participant. However Sri Lankan argue that the umpires did not have any points with the ball after they took it to their custody at stumps on day two.

Sri Lanka declare that they have been knowledgeable in regards to the cost ten minutes earlier than play on day three though each groups had arrived on the venue greater than two hours previous to the beginning of day’s play.

Match Referee Srinath additionally has been accused of inconsistency. The vacationers declare that after they have been reluctant to take the sector, Srinath had assured there could be no imposition of the 5 penalty runs sanction or a change of change the ball. Nevertheless, after they took the sector, the umpires did utterly the other holding up play once more.

Sri Lanka are believed to have accused umpire Ian Gould of getting carried away after the ball tampering fiasco in South Africa early this yr that noticed three Australian gamers getting suspended.

Sri Lankan additionally query whether or not the 5 run penalty rule was utilized on all events in current occasions when groups have been accused of ball-tampering.

Up to date at 1:16 pm on June 21.

© Cricbuzz


Source link